Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS) Technology Being Developed to Prevent Alcohol-Impaired Drivers from Operating Vehicles
As a personal injury law firm that regularly represents Clients who have been injured, or who have lost a loved one, at the fault of an intoxicated driver, we are excited by early reports detailing the development of the Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS). The following is an article on the technology that was recently posted on the website of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration:
Waltham, Mass. -- U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator David Strickland today took a first look at new Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS) technology being developed to prevent alcohol-impaired drivers from operating their vehicles while under the influence.
Secretary LaHood and Administrator Strickland were joined by Shane Karr, vice president for Federal Government Affairs at the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, and Laura Dean Mooney, national president of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), and JD Crouch, president of QinetiQ North America's Technology Solutions Group for a demonstration of DADSS technology at the QinetiQ lab where it is under development in Waltham, Mass.
While still in the developmental stages, DADSS is seen as a potential tool for keeping drunk drivers from being able to operate their car if their blood alcohol concentration is at or above the legal intoxication limit (.08 BAC or higher). The technology could be voluntarily installed as an option for new cars. One system under evaluation determines the blood alcohol concentration through a touch-based approach and another system uses a breath-based approach.
NHTSA research shows that drivers involved in fatal accidents with blood alcohol levels above the .08 legal limit are eight times more likely to have had a prior conviction for impaired driving than drivers who had no alcohol in their bodies at the time of a wreck.
"Drunk driving continues to be a national tragedy that needlessly claims the lives of thousands of people on our highways each year," said Secretary LaHood. "We need to put an end to it."
MADD President Laura Dean-Mooney, who was left a widow and single mother when a drunk driver killed her husband, Mike Dean, welcomed the progress of the DADSS research effort, saying, "Auto makers have stepped up to help turn cars into the cure. This project has made substantial progress and this technology could one day be an important step in our efforts to eliminate drunk driving."
DADSS is being developed under a five-year, $10 million cooperative initiative between NHTSA and the Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety (ACTS), an industry group representing most of the world's auto makers.
"What we're doing is developing technology that won't interfere with sober drivers, will require virtually no maintenance or upkeep and will have such precision that it only stops a driver when their blood alcohol content is .08 BAC or higher, which is the illegal limit for drunk driving in every state," said Shane Karr. "Now that we have actual prototypes, a tremendous feat in itself, we'll be working to identify the gaps in performance between these prototypes and the precise standards we've identified as true technology requirements. This will point the way forward for the next phase of research."
"The technology we are seeing here today could quite simply signal a new frontier in the fight against drunk driving," said NHTSA Administrator Strickland.
The next stage of development, which would include practical demonstrations of one or more of the alcohol detection technologies, could begin later this year.
"Whatever the future holds for these advanced drunk driving prevention technologies, one thing remains clear; no technology can, or should, ever replace a driver's personal responsibility not to drive drunk," the Administrator said.
In 2009, 10,839 people died nationwide in crashes involving a drunk driver. These deaths make up 32 percent of all fatal crashes.


Rapes, sexual assaults, and violent attacks regularly occur in shopping malls, hotels, apartments, and parking lots in Atlanta and other major cities in Georgia. In Georgia, a property owner may be responsible for protecting those legally on his or her property from such criminal acts under certain circumstances. For example, if the owner of a mall, hotel, apartment, or parking lot has reason to anticipate a criminal act based upon the occurrence of prior similar acts, there is then a duty to exercise ordinary care to guard against any further criminal acts. If the owner fails in this duty by failing to control access to his or her premise, by failing to have adequate security, or by failing to have proper lighting on the property, the property owner is liable to anyone suffers injuries as a consequence.
Given Mr. Johnson's apparent fault in causing this incident, he may also be held liable in a civil action for the wrongful death of Mr. Lehr and Ms. Lehr and the injuries sustained by the other victims. The victims and their family could potentially recover a substantial sum, but the ultimate recovery is dependent upon the insurance coverage held by Mr. Johnson. Because there are multiple injured parties and this insurance coverage may be limited, it is critical that the victims act quickly to ensure that such coverage is not exhausted.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has announced a recall of almost 800,000 child seats because the harness may not effectively protect the child. The child seats were made by the Dorel Juvenile Group and were sold under the brand names Safety 1st, Maxi-Cosi, Cosco and Eddie Bauer. Last year the NHTSA received reports that the restraining straps on the seats had loosened during travel. Christopher Jensen, The New York Times 02/14/2011

January 24-28, 2011 marked the latest enforcement wave of the Georgia TACT program was conducted last week on I-75 in Catoosa and Whitfield counties. TACT, or Targeting Aggressive Cars and Trucks, combines enforcement and education to increase driver awareness of the dangers associated with risky driving behaviors around commercial motor vehicles. During the five-day effort, troopers and MCCD officers made 296 contacts that included 123 commercial vehicle inspections, 101 citations, and 72 warnings. Included in the activity were 11 citations and 22 warnings to drivers of commercial vehicles for following too closely. Of the 123 inspections, six vehicles and six drivers were placed out of service with inspections revealing 84 equipment violations and 105 driver violations.


Given Ms. Bolch's apparent fault in causing this car accident, she may be held civilly liable for the injuries that she caused to the victims of this collision. The victims may elect pursue a claim against Ms. Bolch and her insurance carrier for the medical expenses that they have incurred, as well as the pain and suffering that they have experienced. Because of the multiple parties involved in this incident, it is important that the injured victims retain legal representation without delay so as to protect their individual interests. Failure to act quickly may result in a circumstance where there is little or no insurance coverage remaining to properly compensate all injured parties. 
Mr. Banks' family will almost certainly be entitled to substantial compensation as a consequence of this incident. At the outset, Mr. Banks' family will be automatically entitled financial benefits under Georgia's workers compensation laws. It is important that the family retain a knowledgeable lawyer to assist them in securing these benefits, however, as the workers compensation is complicated. In addition to compensation available under the workers compensation code, they may also have a third party civil claim against any party other than the employer who may be responsible for this tragic incident. Because this third party claim will be dependent upon the factual circumstances surrounding the incident, it is critical a knowledgeable lawyer be immediately retained to preserve any evidence associated with the accident. 
Given Ms. Harris' apparent fault in causing this car accident, she may be held civilly liable for the injuries that she caused to Ms. Rule and the 6-year-old. The victims may elect to pursue a claim against Ms. Harris and her insurance carrier for the medical expenses that they have incurred, as well as the pain and suffering that they have experienced. It is important that the victims consult an experienced law firm as soon as possible so that lawyers may seek to preserve the evidence relating to this accident.
It appears certain that the driver of the vehicle that struck Mr. Duncan will be held criminally responsible in causing his death and, as such, Mr. Duncan's family may elect to pursue a civil lawsuit against the driver for the wrongful death of their family member. Mr. Duncan's family is 
