Security Negligence? Our Legal Take: 7-Year-Old Shot While Sleeping at Paradise East Apartments

(CBS 46)

(CBS 46)

Security Negligence? Our Legal Take: 7-Year-Old Shot While Sleeping at Paradise East Apartments

Local News

A 7-year-old girl is reportedly recovering from a drive-by shooting at the Paradise East Apartments complex, which occurred shortly before midnight Tuesday, January 13, 2016.

According to CBS 46, the young victim was sleeping in her bed when multiple shooters sprayed gunfire into her Paradise East apartment building on Bouldercrest Road. One of the bullets apparently pierced the child’s bedroom wall, striking her in the leg. She was transported to the hospital and “is expected to recover.”

Police have not yet identified suspects in the drive-by shooting, once again leaving apartment residents concerned for the safety of their families.

One resident apparently told media, “Bullets were flying everywhere in my apartment. I’m just thankful my kids are okay. This is the second time this has happened in the past three months, and a murder happened here about a month ago. This is getting ridiculous.”

Fox News 5 reports confirm a man was shot and killed at the same complex less than a month ago, on December 16, 2015. Two others were apparently shot at the complex in a robbery attempt in April 2015.

Our Legal Take

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on property. Given the reported history of violence at the Paradise East Apartments complex, The Murray Law Firm is questioning the level of security provided to residents and whether this unconscionable attack may have been prevented.

  • How did the gunmen and vehicle gain entry to the property? What security measures, such as gated-entry, bright lighting, surveillance cameras and security patrols, were in place to protect residents and deter crime at the time of the shooting?
  • Were any additional security precautions implemented by the complex owner and management following prior reports of criminal activity on property?

By law, apartment owners are required to protect all residents and guests legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm.  Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner or management company failed to provide adequate security, the young victim and her family may elect to seek justice and pursue a legal claim for her injuries.

Based upon its extensive and successful experience in handling negligent security cases against apartment complexes in Georgia, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the apartment and property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed.

We Fight for Victims of Apartment Security Negligence in Georgia…Contact us Now for a Free Consultation.

Headline Frame Fox News DeskThe Murray Law Firm has recovered millions of dollars for victims of unsafe properties in Georgia, and recently obtained a $29.25 million dollar verdict for one of our Georgia Clients in Fulton County State Court.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 404.842.1600. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice


Choosing the Right Attorney

Selecting the right attorney for you or your family is highly important. You must feel confident that the attorney you hire has a complete understanding of the law applicable to your particular case, and has successful experience in handling such cases.

Important: Do not hire a lawyer who has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct!!!

You should not hire an attorney who calls you or visits you unsolicited, or anyone that contacts you directly to offer legal services. This activity is strictly prohibited by Rule 7.3 of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which states as follows:

ABA Center for Professional ResponsibilityA LAWYER “SHALL NOT” CONTACT A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT THROUGH A “LIVE TELEPHONE” OR AN “IN-PERSON” VISIT.

– RULE 7.3, ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

If an attorney, or someone acting on behalf of an attorney, contacts you in this manner, that attorney is in violation of this Rule. This unethical and unprofessional activity on the part of the lawyer is good sign that you should stay away. It is imperative that you are represented by an attorney who is capable of advocating for you within the confines of the law, and an attorney who fails to abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct is probably not the best fit. In fact, any such attorney should be immediately reported to the local State Bar Association. If you have been contacted in such an unsolicited manner, contact us and we’ll assist you in filing a report.

SAC EM Update

Contingency Fees Disclaimer: “Contingent attorneys’ fees refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.