Negligent Security? Our Legal Take: Atlanta Street Shootings, Gainesville

Aug 2014 Shooting Investigation Atlanta Street Apartments (WSBTV 2)

Shooting Investigation at Atlanta Street Apartments Aug 2014 (WSBTV 2)

Negligent Security? Our Legal Take: Atlanta Street Shootings, Gainesville

Did negligent security contribute to the shootings of two young men, only days apart? Read Our Legal Take to find out if the victims may have legal claims for compensation.

Local News

Two shootings outside an apartment complex on Atlanta Street in less than a week have left two young men injured and raise grave security questions for residents of the area.

According to The Gainesville Times, 25-year-old David Anthony King was reportedly shot “around 8:30 p.m. Wednesday on Atlanta Street.” Mr. King was transported to Northeast Georgia Medical Center with “non-fatal” injuries, per media reports. His current condition has not been released.

The second shooting “occurred after 10:00 p.m. Sunday on Atlanta Street,” The Gainesville Times reports. 19-year-old Lynquavius Fortson suffered “a single, non-fatal gunshot wound” in what appears to have been a drive-by shooting.

Police are still searching for suspects in both cases, presumably leaving residents concerned for the safety of their families. Media reports indicate shootings occurred at the same complex in June 2015 and August 2014.

Our Legal Take

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. Given the reported history of local gun violence, The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided to those at the apartment complex and whether these shootings may have been prevented.

  • How did the gunmen gain entry to the property? What security measures, such as gated-entry, bright lighting, surveillance cameras, and security patrols, were in place to protect residents at the time of the shooting?
  • Following reports of a prior gun-related activity on or near the property, were any additional security precautions implemented by the apartment complex owner or management company to deter crime?

By law, property owners in Georgia are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm.  Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner or management company failed to provide adequate security, Mr. King and Mr. Fortson may elect to seek justice and pursue legal claims for their injuries.

Based upon its long, extensive, and successful experience in handling negligent security cases against property owners in the State of Georgia, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed.

We Fight for Victims of Apartment Security Negligence in Georgia…Contact us Now for a Free Consultation.

Headline Frame Fox News DeskThe Murray Law Firm has recovered millions of dollars for victims of unsafe properties in Georgia, and recently obtained a $29.25 million dollar verdict for one of our Georgia Clients in Fulton County State Court.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 404.842.1600. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice


Choosing the Right Attorney

Selecting the right attorney for you or your family is highly important. You must feel confident that the attorney you hire has a complete understanding of the law applicable to your particular case, and has successful experience in handling such cases.

Important: Do not hire a lawyer who has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct!!!

You should not hire an attorney who calls you or visits you unsolicited, or anyone that contacts you directly to offer legal services. This activity is strictly prohibited by Rule 7.3 of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which states as follows:

ABA Center for Professional ResponsibilityA LAWYER “SHALL NOT” CONTACT A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT THROUGH A “LIVE TELEPHONE” OR AN “IN-PERSON” VISIT.

– RULE 7.3, ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

If an attorney, or someone acting on behalf of an attorney, contacts you in this manner, that attorney is in violation of this Rule. This unethical and unprofessional activity on the part of the lawyer is good sign that you should stay away. It is imperative that you are represented by an attorney who is capable of advocating for you within the confines of the law, and an attorney who fails to abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct is probably not the best fit. In fact, any such attorney should be immediately reported to the local State Bar Association. If you have been contacted in such an unsolicited manner, contact us and we’ll assist you in filing a report.

728x90 Justice

Contingency Fees Disclaimer: “Contingent attorneys’ fees refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.