Security Lapse? Our Legal Take: Three Adults, Infant Injured in Shooting Outside Austin Oaks Apartments

(WSBTV News)

(WSBTV News)

Security Lapse? Our Legal Take: Three Adults, Infant Injured in Shooting Outside Austin Oaks Apartments

Local News

An infant and three adults were reportedly injured when gunfire erupted outside the Austin Oaks Apartments Monday night, October 12, 2015.

According to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, an armed assailant “walked into the breezeway at the Austin Oaks apartments, on Glenwood Avenue near Decatur, and started shooting shortly after 8 p.m.” Three adults suffered “gunshot wounds to the lower extremities” during the attack. All three were reportedly transported to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. A baby boy, believed to be around one-year-old, was transported to Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston in critical condition, per media reports.

Police have not yet captured the gunman, apparenlty leaving residents once again concerned for the safety of their families.  The AJC reveals the complex has a history of gun violence, including the fatal shooting of a teenage boy in 2013 and the fatal double shooting of two police officers in 2008. In 2013, DeKalb County Police Chief Cedric Alexander told reporters, “Clearly, there are some issues that are still very prevalent as it relates to crime … at that complex.”

Our Legal Take

Apartment complex residents have a right to feel safe and secure while in the community. Given the alleged history of criminal violence on property, The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided to those on the Austin Oaks property and whether this horrific attack may have been prevented.

  • How did the intruder gain entry to the property? What access-controls and security measures, such as gated entry, fencing, surveillance cameras, bright lighting, and security patrols, were in place to protect residents and deter crime?
  • Were any additional security precautions implemented by the Austin Oaks owner or management company, following previous reports of criminal activity, to protect residents and guests?

By law, apartment owners are required to protect all residents and guests legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm.  Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner or management company failed to provide adequate security, the victims may elect to seek justice and pursue a legal claim for their injuries. Based upon its extensive and successful experience in handling negligent security cases against apartment complexes in Georgia, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the apartment and property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed.

We Fight for Victims of Security Negligence in Georgia…Contact us Now for a Free Consultation.

Headline Frame Fox News DeskThe Murray Law Firm has recovered millions of dollars for victims of unsafe properties in Georgia, and recently obtained a $29.25 million dollar verdict for one of our Clients in Fulton County State Court.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 404.842.1600. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice


Choosing the Right Attorney

Selecting the right attorney for you or your family is highly important. You must feel confident that the attorney you hire has a complete understanding of the law applicable to your particular case, and has successful experience in handling such cases.

Important: Do not hire a lawyer who has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct!!!

You should not hire an attorney who calls you or visits you unsolicited, or anyone that contacts you directly to offer legal services. This activity is strictly prohibited by Rule 7.3 of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which states as follows:

ABA Center for Professional ResponsibilityA LAWYER “SHALL NOT” CONTACT A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT THROUGH A “LIVE TELEPHONE” OR AN “IN-PERSON” VISIT.

– RULE 7.3, ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

If an attorney, or someone acting on behalf of an attorney, contacts you in this manner, that attorney is in violation of this Rule. This unethical and unprofessional activity on the part of the lawyer is good sign that you should stay away. It is imperative that you are represented by an attorney who is capable of advocating for you within the confines of the law, and an attorney who fails to abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct is probably not the best fit. In fact, any such attorney should be immediately reported to the local State Bar Association. If you have been contacted in such an unsolicited manner, contact us and we’ll assist you in filing a report.

SAC EM Update

Contingency Fees Disclaimer: “Contingent attorneys’ fees refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.